3/16/2021 0 Comments Eve Ng Pro
The official documentation covers each deployment scenario and what you need to do for it.Ive went from VMs on my laptop to using XEN on some old machine to VMware ESXi.ESXi is great, but with time, I kept finding myself doing a lot of the same thing over and over, and although I automated most parts that are repetitive, I felt like I wanted something a bit quicker that just works.It works well with images, it can be automated, and it does nested virtualization very, very well.
Nested Virtualization and speed to bring VMs up were my two absolutely favorite parts, especially as I started working on Contrail and Openstack. I still happily run oVirt today for everything, except Networking Labs. Thats the spot I realized I needed something fresh that tackles the problem of network devices labs in a smarter way. Unfortunately, creating such labs over oVirt or even nested over KVM within a linux host can be very tricky and time consuming with lots of moving parts that can easily break it. It just didnt make sense to me that running a back-to-back connection between two devices meant youd create a bridge and link both VMs on it. This is also how ESXi does it apparently, and it is a very tedious process that I dont think Id want to go through when I want to quickly spin something up to try it. It solves the missing piece of making such labs easier to build, and it does it in an intuitive way. You have Linux (of course), and you have an increasing list of supported network virtual devices including Juniper, Cisco, F5, and many others. The User Interface of EVE-NG makes it so that the topology you see does actually work. You can place the devices, Drag-and-Drop cables to establish connectivity between the devices and select the wanted ports, re-organize and label things, it just does it in a good presentable way that also allows a speedy lab building process. There are many other features that you should definitely check out on their website. I would highly recommend sticking with officially supported deployment options to ensure that youre getting the best possible performance, as well as support over the community chat. It provides the best possible performance for the hosted VMs. While you can deploy it over some other platforms (I tested EVE-NG Nested over oVirt), it wont work as good. Just to give you an example: Booting vMX 17.4R1 over Nested EVE-NG over KVM used to take me 50mins until everything is up. On Bare, it takes roughly 7 minutes from booting to FPC becoming online Oh and it gets better: vQFX starts in less than 3 minutes for me Thats huge. Both share the same list of supported images, but the differences are mostly about features. While I believe Community edition will be suitable for most people Ive used it for a while -, the reason I went with PRO edition is literally one feature: Hot Linking. Hot linking allows you to interconnect nodes while running, without needing to shut the nodes down, modify the connectivity, then start again. ![]() Some other PRO features like Integrated WireShark and ability to run Containers in Labs are good to have, but it depends on what you plan to run. In a nutshell, go for a test of Community edition, then switch to PRO if device linking becomes irritating.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |